[Print view]
in learning organisations (e.g. school, VET, adult education, higher education)
for those out of work or returning to work (e.g. young people/NEETs, unemployed workers, women returners)
for those in work
for those who are seeking to taper or stop paid work (e.g. moving to part-time work or retirement)
Quantitative methods e.g. surveys
Longitudinal methods e.g. tracking clients, cohort studies
Control trials
Secondary analysis of administrative data e.g. re-examining service monitoring data
Literature review/ meta-analysis
Other (please specify)
No
No
Website address
Attached files
This information was provided/updated by:
Publication name
UU-centrenes vejledning
Author(s)
Ministry of education
Date of publication
June 2013
Country of publication
Denmark
Abstract (in English)
Effect studies and quality measurements of Youth Guidance is in the Act on guidance. The youth Guidance Centers must have a system for quality control and quality assurance which contain:
• An annual plan for following up the results of quality assurance raises .
• Transition rates of transition between primary and secondary education , or other activity
• An annual user survey , which includes those who receive guidance from UU
Ministry conducts an annual user survey of students in public schools 9 and 10 pm. for examination by users benefit from UU 's guidance.
The User Survey has been made since 2009. The response rate from the participating schools is high ( 65-67 per cent . ) And over half of all students responding to the survey ( in 2012 the response rate was 57% ) .
The key question is whether students are getting the guidance in relation to making choices of education. There can hardly establishes a clear relationship between guidance and effects, but it is possible to make some contexts of supervision contribution to the overall effect .
• An annual plan for following up the results of quality assurance raises .
• Transition rates of transition between primary and secondary education , or other activity
• An annual user survey , which includes those who receive guidance from UU
Ministry conducts an annual user survey of students in public schools 9 and 10 pm. for examination by users benefit from UU 's guidance.
The User Survey has been made since 2009. The response rate from the participating schools is high ( 65-67 per cent . ) And over half of all students responding to the survey ( in 2012 the response rate was 57% ) .
The key question is whether students are getting the guidance in relation to making choices of education. There can hardly establishes a clear relationship between guidance and effects, but it is possible to make some contexts of supervision contribution to the overall effect .
This paper addresses the impact of career development... [Tick all that apply]
across the life coursein learning organisations (e.g. school, VET, adult education, higher education)
for those out of work or returning to work (e.g. young people/NEETs, unemployed workers, women returners)
for those in work
for those who are seeking to taper or stop paid work (e.g. moving to part-time work or retirement)
Methodologies reported in this paper: [Tick all that apply]
Qualitative methods e.g. interviews, focus groupsQuantitative methods e.g. surveys
Longitudinal methods e.g. tracking clients, cohort studies
Control trials
Secondary analysis of administrative data e.g. re-examining service monitoring data
Literature review/ meta-analysis
Other (please specify)
Is an English language version of this paper or report available?
YesNo
If no would you be prepared to speak to the consultant to discuss the content of the report?
YesNo
Why did you recommend this report?
Additional information
Website address
Attached files
This information was provided/updated by:
No comments by users.